tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12088205.post114128581967114708..comments2024-03-28T11:01:49.275+13:00Comments on The Laughing Gastronome: fishEmmahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04239687384235518507noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12088205.post-47364270462046887572007-04-12T05:04:00.000+12:002007-04-12T05:04:00.000+12:00My future father in law is a government oceanograp...My future father in law is a government oceanography guy, in charge of setting fishing quotas, and he refuses to eat any fish that has a life cycle of longer than 4 years. This is based on the theory that fish accumulate so many toxins from the ocean, and buying a small fish doesn't necessarily guarantee it is a young one. So he basically will only eat certain types of salmon.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12088205.post-1141352076726154172006-03-03T15:14:00.000+13:002006-03-03T15:14:00.000+13:00It seems that way Emma. I think it is something to...It seems that way Emma. I think it is something to do with the more sustainable fish being bottam feeders in shallow waters. This is according to my Chinese friend, owner of IE Produce in Auckland.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12088205.post-1141334103331081332006-03-03T10:15:00.000+13:002006-03-03T10:15:00.000+13:00Interesting . . . the more you learn the more you...Interesting . . . the more you learn the more you learn. So is it that the deeper the fish the worse, in terms of sustainability, but the better in terms of health?<BR/>EmmaEmmahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04239687384235518507noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12088205.post-1141333650276500162006-03-03T10:07:00.000+13:002006-03-03T10:07:00.000+13:00Problem is the deeper sea fish like snapper are c...Problem is the deeper sea fish like snapper are cleaner fish and supposedly healthier for us than the species recommended as first choices.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com